需要金幣:500 個金幣 | 資料包括:完整論文 | ||
轉換比率:金額 X 10=金幣數量, 例100元=1000金幣 | 論文字數:見簡介 | ||
折扣與優惠:團購最低可5折優惠 - 了解詳情 | 論文格式:Word格式(*.doc) |
譯文(字數 3360) 題目:探索企業經營能力,盈利能力和發展能力之間的關系 摘要:通過對30家上市家電企業的數據集進行聚類分析和規范相關方法,探討企業經營能力,盈利能力和發展能力之間的關系。 研究表明,企業的盈利能力和發展能力受經營能力的影響,資產周轉應集中。 此外,企業盈利能力與發展能力的關系不明顯。 換句話說,不僅應該關注盈利能力,而且要考慮企業的發展能力。 關鍵詞:聚類分析•規范相關性•開發能力•企業競爭力•經營能力•盈利能力 介紹:企業競爭力是指在競爭性市場中,企業可以提供比其他企業更有效的產品或服務,并實現盈利和自我發展的能力。如何有效地評價企業競爭力,許多學者作了積極探索。 Chen和Chen認為企業競爭力的評價具有模糊性,采用模糊綜合評價(FCE)進行定量評價,構建指標體系。 Liu and Zong應用數據包絡分析(DEA)來研究企業競爭力。 Yin和Zhang通過提取共同因素消除多重共線性并使用因子分數模型進行綜合評價,從而將因素分析納入企業競爭力評價中。應用分析層次過程(AHP)來評估企業核心競爭力的指標體系。考慮到指標之間的相關性,郭先生使用分析網絡過程(ANP)建立了企業軟功率評估模型。 Zhang通過分析外部環境和業務流程來調查企業能力和競爭力之間的動態關系。 Sun采用PCA-PINMAP計算指標權重,并通過TOPSIS方法建立了企業競爭力評價模型。根據上述文獻的研究,我們發現許多學者專注于綜合評價研究,但是,很少有研究集中在研究企業競爭力內部互動的不同組成部分。本文嘗試使用聚類分析和規范相關方法來解決這個問題。
外文原文(字符數 14161) Exploring the Relationship Among the Enterprise Operation Ability, Profitability and Development Ability Tong Liu and Ya-juan Han Abstract The paper explores the relationships among enterprise operation ability, profitability and development ability by applying cluster analysis and canonical correlation methods which are performed on a dataset of 30 listed household electrical appliance enterprises. The study shows that enterprise profitability and development ability are affected by operation ability, and assets turnover should be focused. Besides, the relationship between enterprise profitability and development ability is not apparent. In other words, not only profitability should be focused, but also do think about the enterprise development ability. Keywords Cluster analysis • Canonical correlation • Development ability • Enter-prise competitiveness • Operation ability • Profitability
Introduction
The enterprise competitiveness is such ability that in a competitive market, an enterprise can provide more effective products or services than other companies and make profitability and self-development (Porter 1985; Zhang et al. 2003). How to evaluate the enterprise competitiveness effectively, many scholars made positive explorations. Chen and Chen believed that the evaluation of the enterprise compet-itiveness had a fuzzy character, and adopted fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) to make a quantitative evaluation and construct an index system (Chen and Zhang 1999; Chen 2005). Liu and Zong applied the data envelopment analysis (DEA) to study the enterprise competitiveness (Liu 2001; Zong et al. 2002). Yin and Zhang brought the factor analysis into the evaluation of the enterprise competitiveness by extracting common factors to eliminate multicollinearity and using the model of factor scores to make a comprehensive evaluation (Yin and Liu 2004; Zhang et al. 2006). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to evaluate the index system of enterprise core competitiveness by Yin et al. (2007). Considering the correlation between indexes, Guo used the analytic network process (ANP) to set up an enterprise soft power evaluation model (Guo and Liang 2008). Zhang investigated the dynamic relationship between the enterprise ability and competitiveness by analyzing the external environment and business processes (Zhang et al. 2011). Sun adopted PCA-PINMAP to calculate the index weights, and set up an enterprise competitiveness evaluation model by using TOPSIS method (Sun et al. 2011). According to the study of the above literatures, we find that many scholars focused on a comprehensive evaluation research, however, few researches focused on the study of the different components of the internal interaction about the enterprise competitiveness. The paper attempts to use cluster analysis and canonical correla-tion methods to solve this problem. |