摘要：法院調解是指在法院審判人員的主持下，雙方當事人就權益爭議自愿、平等的進行協商，達成協議，解決糾紛的訴訟活動和結案方式。我國當代的法院調解的模式是“調審結合”的模式。法院調解具有及時高效、徹底、經濟、公正等優勢，但也一些問題。情理是普通民眾基于最真摯、最原始的普遍情感對事件的是非曲直做出的共同性的判斷。情理具有普遍性、主客觀的辯證統一性、概念的模糊性、倫理性等特征。情理因素可以克服調解過程中的職權主義，避免在調解中過分糾纏案情，克服調解過程中苛求合法性的缺點從而營造和諧的調解氛圍，提高法院調解的成功率。在調審結合的模式下運用情理因素主體應當包括法官和當事人，運用情理因素時要注重靈活性與原則性相結合。

關鍵詞：情理 法院調解 司法 實體正義

Abstract: Litigation mediation is under the chairmanship of the judge, the parties negotiate equally and reached an agreement to resolve the dispute. The litigation mediation has the advantage of high efficiency, thorough justice. The litigation mediation also has some problems. Reasonable factors mess people judge the things with inner feelings. Reasonable have the characteristics of universality, dialectical unity, concept of fuzziness, ethical. Reasonable can overcome the power interference. It can get out of trouble of details of cases, and overcome the shortcomings of the legality of demanding. Reasonable factors can create harmonious atmosphere to improve the success rate of the court mediation. The people who use the reasonable factors shall include the judge and the parties, they should combined flexibility with principle when using reasonable factors.

Key words: Reasonable, Litigation Mediation, Judicature,Substantive Justice