譯文（字數 5068）：

環境、健康和安全管理指標的描述性模型

在很多其他事情中，系統管理要求對實際系統的狀態和發展趨勢有一個,徹底和持續的理解。為此,管理者需要依靠系統優缺點的描述和解釋模型。這么做的其中一個方法就是指標。

在管理科學的見證下，環境健康和安全（EHS）在管理（金融、經濟、法律）的所有領域取得廣泛發展，同時又使用了指標進行處理。

人們可以在文獻中發現關于怎樣發展和使用EHS管理指標的多種參考資料和指南。雖然未經詳盡調查，但OECD, IAEA,和CCPS 是眾所周知的國際指南建議發布的例子，這些建議都是關于普遍或專業商業領域的，包括部分EHS領域。在本文中我們將看到，對于決策者而言尤為困難的是在大量的參考資料和指標中挑選出適用于他們組織的正確指標。我們還將看到,這個選擇過程的主要困難是評估指標的相關性時要考慮的多種多樣的尺寸規格。這個模型將呈現我們認為對每個EHS指標都必要的描述特征，以此來幫助決策者回答一個簡單的問題:這個指標對我們組織好還是不好？

外文原文（字符數 17126）：

Descriptive Model of Indicators for Environment, Health

and Safety Management

Chabane Mazri*a, Aleksander Jovanovicb, Daniel Balosc

Management of systems requires, amongst many other things, a thorough and continuous

understanding of the actual system’s state and its development trends. To do so, managers need to rely on both descriptive and explicative models of the system’s strengths and weaknesses. One of the means to do so are indicators.

Widely developed in all areas of management (financial, economic, logistics), Environment Health and Safety (EHS), seen by management science, are also to be approached using indicators.

One can find in literature multiple references and guidelines on how to develop and/or use indicators for EHS management. Without being exhaustive, OECD, IAEA, and CCPS are examples of well known international guidelines suggesting indicators for various or specific business areas regarding all or some of the EHS dimensions. In this paper, we will see that it is particularly difficult for decision makers to select the right indicators for their organization amongst dozens of various references and hundreds of indicators. We will also see that the main difficulty in this selection process is the multiple dimensions to be considered when assessing the relevance of an indicator.